Friday, August 31, 2007

The Lovell Family

At this point, we don't know details as to why Thomas Lovell killed his wife before he killed himself.

We do know that he chose to leave his 3-year-old stepson to spend his life without his mother.

Kenosha -- A man and his wife, married June 9, were found dead in an apparent murder-suicide in their home, where their 3-year-old child spent hours before authorities discovered the deaths, police said yesterday.

Relatives called police about 8 p.m. Wednesday, after becoming concerned that the husband and wife didn't show up at work at the Kenosha County-owned Brookside Care Center and had missed appointments.

The 3-year-old boy let a relative in the home. Police wouldn't specify where the bodies were found or whether the boy knew of the deaths.

"Once the child woke up, he was in the home alone all day," police Lt. Ron Bartholomew said.

The child was being cared for by family members.

Bartholomew said Thomas Lovell, Jr., 35, had strangled his wife, Jennifer Lovell, 24, early Wednesday and then hanged himself.

By the time police arrived, "it was apparent the bodies had been there for quite some time," Bartholomew said.

The Kenosha County medical examiner performed autopsies Thursday afternoon, but results were not immediately available.

Thomas Lovell, Jr. left a note that indicated responsibility and gave reasons for the deaths, Bartholomew said. He declined to release the information with the investigation still going on.

...Neighbors said they weren't aware of any problems.

"I never would have known anything was wrong," next-door neighbor Shanise West said.

..."[Jennifer Lovell] seemed really nice and he seemed really normal," [Andrea Lindsley, who lives across the street,] said.

She said Jennifer Lovell told her that her husband was the only father in the life of her 3-year-old son, who was Thomas Lovell Jr.'s stepson.

Bottom line: Thomas Lovell is a murderer. Jennifer Lovell is a victim.

Hopefully, her 3-year-old won't carry around any vivid memories of what he experienced the day of their deaths.

What's heartbreaking is the possibility that the little boy may go through his life with very few memories of his mother.

Larry Craig Going Down

There is an inevitability about this.

Republicans want Larry Craig to resign NOW.

WASHINGTON -- Idaho Sen. Larry Craig is considering resigning, Republican officials said Friday, after days of public and private pressure stemming from his arrest in June in a police undercover operation at an airport men's room.

Craig pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct on Aug. 1, and while he has since said he did nothing wrong, the episode has roiled the Republican party and produced numerous calls for him to step down.

As a measure of the pressure Craig faces, party officials said a statement had been drafted at Republican Party headquarters calling for the third-term senator to resign. It was not issued, these officials said, in response to concerns that it might complicate quiet efforts under way to persuade the 62-year-old lawmaker to give up his seat.

Any resignation would clear the way for Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter, a Republican, to name a replacement who would serve until the end of Craig's current term in 2009. Lt. Gov. James Risch and Rep. Mike Simpson were among the possible replacements, according to the GOP officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

There's no way that Craig can salvage his political career.

It's over.

He should resign. That's the right thing for him to do.

If Craig were a Democrat, everything would be different. They would be circling the wagons to protect him and the lib media would assist. Craig would be embraced.

But Craig is a Republican. Republicans don't stay in office after incidents like this.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Tapping and Touching in Public Spaces

Larry Craig's bathroom visit at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport continues to dominate the news.

His encounter with an undercover police officer has done for bathroom sex what President Bill Clinton did for oral sex. It's in our living rooms now (if it wasn't before) and a topic of current events discussions.

Naturally, knowing the protocol of anonymous bathroom sex has become a concern for many Americans. If you don't know the signals, you could inadvertently give a stranger the wrong impression. For that reason, I think it's vital that this information be taught in the schools. It's a public health issue and should be incorporated into sex education classes.

I've always thought of going into a public restroom as risky business. Now, it seems even more dangerous.

Yesterday, we were treated to the audio of police Sgt. Dave Karsnia interviewing Craig.
That helped bring the lurid episode to life.
Craig told the officer that he travels almost weekly through the Twin Cities airport and that he uses that particular restroom "regularly." Craig suggested that the matter be settled quietly. "Am I going to have to fight you in court?" he asked Karsnia early in the session.

"No, no. I'm not going to court unless you want me there," the officer replied, to which Craig told him: "'Cause I don't want to be in court, either."

He later told Craig: "You're gonna get out of here. You're gonna have to pay a fine, and that will be it. Okay. I don't call the media."

But the interview soon became an argument over the details of the incident and whether Craig's actions were those of a man seeking a sexual encounter or whether he merely misunderstood gestures.

"I am not gay; I don't do these kinds of things," Craig told Karsnia. The officer replied that he did not care what the senator's sexual orientation is but that Craig was not being candid about the incident in the restroom.

In the police report, Karsnia wrote that based on his experience, Craig's touching his foot to the officer's and running his hand under the partition separating the stalls are well-known signals among men who use public restrooms for sexual encounters.

Craig vehemently denied that interpretation of his actions.

"Your foot came toward mine, mine came towards yours. Was that natural? Did we bump? Yes, I think we did. You said so. I won't dispute that," he said, explaining later that he was not sure how their feet came to bump each other. "I'm a fairly wide guy."

Craig also disputed that he swiped his left hand under the partition, which would have shown his wedding ring to Karsnia. He said he bent down to pick up a piece of paper with his right hand, adding that to get his left hand under the partition would have required him to "turned sideways" because his stall was on Karsnia's left-hand side.

The officer said he saw the wedding ring on Craig's hand, and challenged the senator's version of events.

"I expect this from the guy we get out of the 'hood," Karsnia said. "I mean, people vote for you."

Read the transcript of the creepy interview.
___________________

Here's another reported case of touching between strangers:
NEW YORK—During a crowded rush-hour subway ride Monday, an inadvertent brushing of one human being's hand against the forearm of another elicited a swift, contrite apology, subway sources reported.

"Whoops—sorry," said proofreader Heather Wright, 32, immediately following the intrusion into 20-year-old Hunter College student Chris Franek's personal space, which occurred as Wright tried to turn the page of her book with one hand. "Sorry about that."

Responding to Wright's apology, Franek almost inaudibly mumbled, "It's okay."

Green Confessions

I understand that Fr. Dom Anthony Sutch wants members of the flock to be good stewards of the earth, God's creation.

However, I think he's going about it the wrong way by hearing "eco-confessions."

From
The Times:
Forgotten to recycle any newspapers or tin cans recently? Feeling guilty because you neglected to carbon offset your flight to somewhere, anywhere, outside England this summer?

The Roman Catholic Church is at hand with a new line in “green confessions” to help eco-sinners to find forgiveness.

Dom Anthony Sutch, the Benedictine monk who resigned as head of Downside School to become a parish priest in Suffolk, will be at the county’s Waveney Greenpeace festival this weekend to hear eco-confessions in what is thought to be the first dedicated confessional booth of its kind.

Vested in a green chasuble-style garment made from recycled curtains, and in a booth constructed of recycled doors, he will hear the sins of of those who have not recycled the things they ought to have done and who have consumed the things they ought not to have done.

...He told The Times: “It is not, I hope, blasphemous to do this. I do not think it is. It is just an attempt to make people conscious of the way they live. The Church is aware of green issues and of how aware we have to be of how we treat the environment.

“I know the Pope has now set up his own airline, but I am told the Vatican will be planting trees every time it flies. I do think the way we treat our environment is important.

“There is a huge amount of greed in the West. We have to be aware of the consequences of how we live.”

...“I’ve had one or two comments about abuse of the confessional. One or two people have said, ‘Father, is this quite right?’ Luckily, more people see it as an excellent idea. As with all these things, we have to look in the mirror and see what we could stop consuming ourselves.”

...The Waveney Greenpeace confessional concept is based on the Earthly Sins booth which has appeared at the Glastonbury festival and in the lobby of theatre performancs by the comic Rob Newman. A secular construct, Earthly Sins asks penitents to sign a pledge that they will switch to renewable energy or ethical banking.

This makes a mockery of the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

It's nice that Fr. Sutch cares about the environment, but I think it's inappropriate for him to use one of the Catholic Church's sacraments as if it were a carnival attraction.

He claims to have had "one or two comments about abuse of the confessional."

Count me as three.

Hillary, David; David, Hillary

Helping David Letterman celebrate his 14 years on the air at CBS was none other than New York's distinguished senator, former first lady, and Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Hillary dominated the show, getting three segments.

As Hillary came on stage, the band played Bruce Springsteen's Born to Run.

Kind of stupid.

Naturally, she was wearing a pantsuit. She looked sort of tired and bloated. Personally, I prefer to see baggy eyes than an immobilized Botoxed face.

After saying that she had been a guest on the show seven times, Hillary read jokes that Letterman had made about her pantsuits.

It seemed like a set-up. Remember the pop quiz Letterman gave Hillary during the 2000 campaign?

Hillary said she's a good campaigner, her best quality being stamina. God knows, staying married to Bill takes stamina.

Letterman asked her if she has any weaknesses as a campaigner.

After a pause, Hillary said, "Sure." Nothing more.

Big laugh.

Letterman mentioned that she's raised $6o million+ for her campaign.

Hillary admitted that it's an astronomical amount of money for a campaign.

She explained that the Supreme Court decided that political contributions are part of free speech.

She said, "As a senator, and hopefully as president, I will work to change that."

She wants a system of public financing.


Of course, there was no mention of Norman Hsu.


Letterman wanted to know if it's fun campaigning with Bill.

He asked, "Does he ever forget that he's not running?"

Hillary quipped, "Let me say, if the Constitution had not been amended to make it two terms, he might be running."

She went on to invite Letterman on the campaign trail. "It's fun. You should come with us sometime."

Yeah, right.

After the break, they talked a little about Chelsea.

Then Letterman asked, "What's the deal with Sen. Craig?"

The audience laughed but Hillary took the high road. Actually, given Bill's past indiscretions, it was the only road she could take.

She said, "I think it's very sad. I think it's a very sad story. I'm wishing the best for him and his family."

She said the voters of Idaho will have to handle the Craig matter, though I doubt Craig will ever be on a ballot again.

Next topic -- a woman as president.

Are we ready? Can we do it?

Hillary said, "We'll never know whether we can until we try."

She talked about the little girls that want to meet her, as if she's such an inspiring figure. She spoke of all the women in their 90s that want her to be president.

"I know this is a big deal that I might be the first woman president," Hillary said with all the gravitas that she could muster, which wasn't much.

Hillary said that being president is a tough job and being the first woman president would hold a special responsibility.

She said that it will be especially hard following President Bush and Vice President Cheney and rolled her eyes and nodded. Blah, blah, blah.

Letterman talked about Hillary being a Republican, that dark, scary past.

She talked about growing up in the Midwest, like Letterman. It sounded to me like she was courting flyover country bigtime.

In the third and final segment, the discussion was Iraq. Things got very serious.

Hillary said:

"There are no good options."

"But I think we need to begin to withdraw our troops now. Bring them home. Make it clear they're not going to continue to referee a civil war."

"There is no military solution."

She said that the troops performed heroically.

They were asked to bring Saddam Hussein to justice and they did. They made free elections happen. Hillary said we should be proud of the military.

Hillary was really in campaign stump speech mode.

Her carefully orchestrated visit with Letterman concluded on a lighter, albeit lame, note. She read her own top ten list.

My top ten campaign promises:

10. Bring civility and long term security to The View.

9. Each year on my birthday every American gets a cupcake.

8. You will have the option of rolling dice against the IRS for double or nothing on your taxes.

7. If you're having trouble getting a flight and Air Force One is available, it's yours.

6. My vice president will never shoot anybody in the face.

5. Turn Gitmo into a Dairy Queen as soon as possible.

4. You know for over a century there have been only two Dakotas; I plan to double that.

3. We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. (Hillary added, "Am I right, ladies?")

2. I will appoint a committee to find out what the heck is happening on Lost.

1. One more pantsuit joke and Letterman disappears.

Those are all better ideas than her plan to socialize medicine.
____________________

Read more.
____________________

Watch.

Powered by AOL Video

Fred Thompson's Announcement Tour



The speculation about when Fred Thompson will officially announce his candidacy for President is over.

From I'm with Fred:

Fred is going to be traveling around the country in the days after he announces his candidacy for President on September 6th. Below is the schedule of events. Please review the event schedule and check back the afternoon of Friday, August 31st to RSVP for bus tour events.

Thursday, September 6
Morning - Des Moines, IA
Evening - Council Bluffs, IA

Friday, September 7
Morning - Sioux City, IA
Evening - Mason City, IA

Saturday, September 8
Morning - Cedar Rapids, IA
Afternoon - Davenport, IA
Evening - Portsmouth, NH

Sunday, September 9
Afternoon - Manchester, NH
Evening - Nashua, NH

Monday, September 10
Morning - Charleston, SC
Afternoon - Columbia, SC

This seems to douse speculation that Thompson will announce during a Wednesday night appearance on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Ambassador Elvira Arellano

Illegal immigrant and felon Elvira Arellano wants to serve her country, Mexico, as an ambassador.

She wants the president of Mexico to appoint her "peace and justice" ambassador so she can return to the U.S.


MEXICO CITY -- The recently deported illegal migrant and activist who took refuge in a Chicago church for a year, has asked the Mexico's president to appoint her "peace and justice" ambassador so she can return to the United States.

..."What I'm asking for is a diplomatic visa so that I can be an ambassador for peace and justice because I'm not a terrorist and the United States can't continue treating undocumented migrants as terrorists," Arellano told reporters after meeting with President Felipe Calderon at the presidential residence, Los Pinos.

In a news release, the president's office said Arellano asked the Mexican government to help her get a visa so she can enter the United States but it did not mention Arellano's request for a diplomatic appointment.

Arellano really is not a good face for "the movement."

Statements like "[T]he United States can't continue treating undocumented migrants as terrorists," make her seem like a complete nutjob.


I don't think she's winning over any hearts and minds with such rhetoric.

Enforcing our immigration laws and deporting felons are perfectly legitimate actions by the U.S. government.

ILLEGAL immigrants aren't being treated as terrorists, unless the ILLEGAL immigrants are suspected terrorists.

Arellano has made it very clear that she thinks she is above the law.

She's not.

How to Help Milwaukee's Poor

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Editorial Board has the answers to alleviate poverty in the city -- attract businesses and jobs to the inner city, and in the interim, look to the government to create public-service jobs to put the unemployed to work.
Bold steps needed to help city's poor

Crisis. There is no other word for it. New poverty figures show that Milwaukee is in the midst of it. But the numbers must spur the entire metropolitan area into action.

One of every four city residents is officially poor - the eighth-worst rate among the nation's big cities. Poverty is like a ball and chain, not just for poor people but also for the entire region. Extensive poverty at its center keeps the seven-county area from rising to its potential.

Two things must happen immediately.

• Public officials and business and civic leaders must come up with a coordinated plan for putting jobs back into the inner city, and then they must execute the plan. Mayor Tom Barrett should play the lead role in this effort, of course, but the Milwaukee 7 regional economic development group, of which Barrett is a leader, also must do more. Reducing poverty must be a leading priority for that group in the coming year.

• Government must stop the bleeding by directly putting unemployed people to work - in temporary public-service jobs that help them move up the job and income ladder. Why not start in a small area and test this idea? It can work.

And there need to be renewed efforts to connect people with the jobs that do exist - the region's biggest economic challenge at the moment.

Of course, jobs are needed to lift people out of poverty, but there's more to it than that.

People have to be committed to working for a living, rather than depending on government assistance.

Furthermore, if parents don't see to it that their children stay in school and out of trouble, with the goal of preparing them to enter the work force and become productive members of society, then the "bold, targeted action" that the JS Editorial Board calls for will flop.

And then there's the personal responsibility factor, something the Board completely ignores.

For instance, it's not a good idea to become a parent when one is still a child.

You don't start a family until you're capable of caring for one; and you don't have more children than you can support.

This article by
Robert Rector is a must-read for the myopic JS Editorial Board.

Rector explains:
Nearly two thirds of poor children reside in single-parent homes; each year, an additional 1.5 million children are born out of wedlock. If poor mothers married the fathers of their children, nearly three quarters of the nation’s impoverished youth would immediately be lifted out of poverty.

...Another important factor boosting poverty in the U.S. is our broken immigration system which imports hundreds of thousands of additional poor people each year from abroad through both legal and illegal immigration channels. One quarter of all poor persons in the U.S. are now first generation immigrants or the minor children of those immigrants. Roughly one in ten of the persons counted among the poor by Census is either an illegal immigrant or the minor child of an illegal. Immigrants tend to be poor because they have very low education levels. A quarter of legal immigrants and fifty to sixty percent of illegals are high-school dropouts. By contrast, only nine percent of non-immigrant Americans lack a high school degree.

I agree that there's a poverty crisis in Milwaukee.

As an example, the editorial points to the case of Johnniemae Ashford, a patient-care worker who's trying to raise five grandchildren on a take-home pay of $187 every two weeks.

Johnniemae Ashford is a 41-year-old African-American woman caught in a poverty trap.

She is raising five grandchildren and takes home$187 every two weeks as a patient-care worker. She needs pots, pans, beds, groceries and cash for a first rent check so she can move her family out of her sister's house and into a new home.

"I need help," Ashford said. "It's just bad out here right now."

...Someone like Ashford can't ignore poverty. She lives with it every day, struggling far below the poverty threshold - around $20,444 in household income for a family of four with two children.

"I don't know anyone who has money," Ashford said.

With the help of the House of Peace community center in Milwaukee, Ashford hopes to scrape together enough food and money to survive another month and move into a new home.

"I try my best to get my grandchildren in a safe environment," Ashford said, holding her 2-year-old granddaughter Zamiliano.

Ashford does need help.

At only 41, she already has FIVE grandchildren to raise.

Where are her grandchildrens' parents?

They should be helping to support their children.

And where's the grandfather, Ashford's husband? What about the other grandparents? They should be helping as well.

I agree that the poverty numbers must spur the entire metropolitan area into action.

That includes the people living in poverty. They need to take action to help themselves and their families.

They need to stop having children out of wedlock.

They need to supervise their children and behave responsibly, like not keeping a loaded gun behind a stove.

They need to make sure their children stay in school and take advantage of the educational opportunities being provided to them by taxpayers.

They need to obey the law.

The Board writes:

One in four Milwaukee residents lives in poverty. That is utterly unacceptable, and the mayor and business leaders must take concrete steps — today — to fight this scourge.

It is utterly unacceptable.

Mayor Barrett, business leaders, community leaders, and the poor residents themselves all must take concrete steps to fight poverty.

Larry Craig is no Ted Kennedy

Larry Craig's "I am not gay" statement yesterday didn't convince colleagues to give him a break.
WASHINGTON -- Idaho Sen. Larry Craig's political support eroded significantly Wednesday as three fellow Republicans in Congress called for his resignation and party leaders pushed him from senior committee posts.

The White House expressed its disappointment, too — and nary a word of support for the 62-year-old lawmaker, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to a charge stemming from an undercover police operation in an airport men's room.

Craig "represents the Republican party," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the first fellow GOP member of Congress to urge a resignation.

My guess is Craig will resign sooner rather than later.

It would be an honorable thing to do, as a representative of the Republican party.

Rather than bringing disgrace to the party, I think Craig's resignation would serve to highlight the standards of integrity within the Democrat party.

__________________________

Here is an account of a scandal, as relayed in PBS's American Experience, "The Kennedys":

Chappaquiddick

Kennedy's family legacy seemed to assure him a competitive candidacy for the presidency -- but for a fatal mistake on July 18, 1969. Following a dutiful appreciation party for the "boiler room girls" who had worked on his brother Robert's campaign, Kennedy drove his car off a bridge in Chappaquiddick, Massachusetts. Although Kennedy managed to escape, his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, drowned. Furthermore, Kennedy did not report the incident immediately. Later, he pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident. Chappaquiddick seemed to quash Kennedy's presidential prospects.

This is an extremely sanitized version of the story. There are many other resources available that go into much more detail.

Although
Y Ted K .com is definitely an anti-Teddy site, it supplies a very comprehensive summary of events, including photos, maps, official documents and statements. Ignore the obvious bias and examine the police reports and the testimony of witnesses. It's quite enlightening.

Here is Kennedy's explanation of what happened 38 years ago:

Edward M. Kennedy: "Chappaquiddick"


Broadcast nationally from Joseph P. Kennedy's home on 25 July 1969

My fellow citizens:

I have requested this opportunity to talk to the people of Massachusetts about the tragedy which happened last Friday evening. This morning I entered a plea of guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. Prior to my appearance in court it would have been improper for me to comment on these matters. But tonight I am free to tell you what happened and to say what it means to me.

On the weekend of July 18, I was on Martha's Vineyard Island participating with my nephew, Joe Kennedy -- as for thirty years my family has participated -- in the annual Edgartown Sailing Regatta. Only reasons of health prevented my wife from accompanying me.

On Chappaquiddick Island, off Martha's Vineyard, I attended, on Friday evening, July 18, a cook-out, I had encouraged and helped sponsor for devoted group of Kennedy campaign secretaries. When I left the party, around 11:15 P.M., I was accompanied by one of these girls, Miss Mary Jo Kopechne. Mary J was one of the most devoted members of the staff of Senator Robert Kennedy. She worked for him for four years and was broken up over his death. For this reason, and because she was such a gentle, kind, and idealistic person, all of us tried to help her feel that she still had a home with the Kennedy family.

There is not truth, not truth whatever, to the widely circulated suspicions of immoral conduct that have been leveled at my behavior and hers regarding that evening. There has never been a private relationship between us of any kind. I know of nothing in Mary Jo's conduct on that or nay other occasion -- the same is true of the other girls at that party -- that would lend any substance to such ugly speculation about their character.

Nor was I driving under the influence of liquor.

Little over one mile away, the car that I was driving on the unlit road went of a narrow bridge which had no guard rails and was built on a left angle to the road. The car overturned in a deep pond and immediately filled with water. I remember thinking as the cold water rushed in around my head that I was for certain drowning. Then water entered my lungs and I actual felt the sensation of drowning. But somehow I struggled to the surface alive.

I made immediate and repeated efforts to save Mary Jo be diving into strong and murky current, but succeeded only in increasing my state of utter exhaustion and alarm. My conduct and conversations during the next several hours, to the extent that I can remember them, make no sense to me at all.

Although my doctors informed me that I suffered a cerebral concussion, as well as shock, I do not seek to escape responsibility for my actions by placing the blame either in the physical, emotional trauma brought on by the accident, or on anyone else. I regard as indefensible the fact that I did not report the accident to the policy immediately.

Instead of looking directly for a telephone after lying exhausted in the grass for an undetermined time, I walked back to the cottage where the party was being held and requested the help of two friends, my cousin, Joseph Gargan and Phil Markham, and directed them to return immediately to the scene with me -- this was sometime after midnight -- in order to undertake a new effort to dive down and locate Miss Kopechne. Their strenuous efforts, undertaken at some risk to their own lives also proved futile.

All kinds of scrambled thoughts -- all of them confused, some of them irrational, many of them which I cannot recall, and some of which I would not have seriously entertained under normal circumstances -- went through my mind during this period. They were reflected in the various inexplicable, inconsistent, and inconclusive things I said and did, including such questions as whether the girl might still be alive somewhere out of that immediate area, whether some awful curse did actually hang over all the Kennedys, whether there was some justifiable reason for me to doubt what has happened and to delay my report, whether somehow the awful weight of this incredible incident might, in some way, pass from my shoulders. I was overcome, I'm frank to say, by a jumble of emotions, grief, fear, doubt, exhaustion, panic, confusion and shock.

Instructing Gargan and Markham not to alarm Mary Jo's friends that night, I had them take me to the ferry crossing. The ferry having shut down for the night, I suddenly jumped into the water and impulsively swam across, nearly drowning once again in the effort, and returned to my hotel about 2 A.M. and collapsed in my room.

I remember going out at one point and saying something to the room clerk.

In the morning, with my mind somewhat more lucid, I made an effort to call a family legal advisor, Burke Marshall, from a public telephone on the Chappaquiddick side of the ferry and belatedly reported the accident to the Martha's Vineyard police.

Today, as I mentioned, I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives.

These events, the publicity, innuendo, and whispers which have surrounded them and my admission of guilt this morning raises the question in my mind of whether my standing among the people of my state has been so impaired that I should resign my seat in the United States Senate. If at any time the citizens of Massachusetts should lack confidence in their Senator's character or his ability, with or without justification, he could not in my opinion adequately perform his duty and should not continue in office.

The people of this State, the State which sent John Quincy Adams, and Daniel Webster, and Charles Sumner, and Henry Cabot Lodge, and John Kennedy to the United States Senate are entitled to representation in that body by men who inspire their utmost confidence. For this reason, I would understand full well why some might think it right for me to resign. For me this will be a difficult decision to make.

It has been seven years since my first election to the Senate. You and I share many memories -- some of them have been glorious, some have been very sad. The opportunity to work with you and serve Massachusetts has made my life worthwhile.

And so I ask you tonight, the people of Massachusetts, to think this through with me. In facing this decision, I seek your advice and opinion. In making it, I seek your prayers -- for this is a decision that I will have finally to make on my own.

It has been written a man does what he must in spite of personal consequences, in spite of obstacles, and dangers, and pressures, and that is the basis of human morality. Whatever may be the sacrifices he faces, if he follows his conscience -- the loss of his friends, his fortune, his contentment, even the esteem of his fellow man -- each man must decide for himself the course he will follow. The stories of the past courage cannot supply courage itself. For this, each man must look into his own soul.

I pray that I can have the courage to make the right decision. Whatever is decided and whatever the future holds for me, I hope that I shall have been able to put this most recent tragedy behind me and make some further contribution to our state and mankind, whether it be in public or private life.

Thank you and good night.

(Source)

Katrina: Two Years Later

Jalen Nelson and all the Others

I think people are becoming desensitized to the crime, the shootings, the dysfunction, the disintegration of the traditional family in the city of Milwaukee.

There have been so many freaking wake up calls that they've become ambient noise.

There are shootings nearly every single day. It's the rare day when no one is hit by a bullet, accidentally or intentionally.

Even the shootings of children, sometimes tragically resulting in death, doesn't seem to shock anymore.

It's business as usual.

When such incidents lose their shock factor, it's an indication of just how serious the crisis in Milwaukee has become.

Of course, as usual there were intentional shootings yesterday, but here's the story of an accidental shooting:

MILWAUKEE -- A 9-year-old boy was shot in the chest Tuesday afternoon on Milwaukee's northwest side, the victim's family said.

The shooting happened in an apartment near 89th Street and Mill Road at about 1:30 p.m.

Milwaukee police said Jalen Nelson was playing with a gun inside his home with his 13-year-old brother, who accidentally shot him.

Family members told 12 News the boys' 16-year-old sister was home with them. They said her boyfriend brought the gun over, left it in her care and the boys got a hold of it.

It's really sick that this 16-year-old didn't properly "care" for her boyfriend's gun.

What's even more troubling is that Milwaukee has so many "parents" that are 16 years old and younger.

Family members said their mother had no idea there was a gun in the house.

They never do.
Police said they are investigating the shooting as an accident but they took Jalen's brother and sister into custody.

Nelson is in good condition, according to the victim's family.

Why take the siblings into custody?

That seems odd in the case of an accident. Do the police have reason to believe the siblings are involved in some other illegal matters?

Thankfully, Nelson survived the shooting.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett responded to the news Tuesday night, calling it an unbelievable situation.

"We have to get rid of the illegal guns, and we have to have parents who are there controlling their children," Barrett said. "We're lucky this time the child didn't get killed."

Wow. I didn't see that coming.

Barrett is horrified over the illegal guns.

He gets points for calling out the parents' failure to monitor their children, with no adults being home at the time of this shooting, but those are negated by his utterly lame handwringing over the illegal guns.

Barrett sounds so stupid when he gets outraged about ILLEGAL guns.

When he says they're ILLEGAL, that means current laws are being broken. It's not a matter of there being no gun control laws at this time.

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin told 12 News there has been an increase in the number of shooting victims who are children.

Shootings of children have increased, but the homicide rate is a little bit lower now than last year at this point.

Barrett loves to cite that homicide rate. Homicides are down. Yes, that's a good thing. Of course, it is; but the number of homicides isn't a good measure of the state of the city in terms of violent crime.

Milwaukee is in dire need of a stronger, better mayor than Barrett.

Norman Hsu


Norman Who?

Let me guess how Hillary Clinton will react to the revelations about Norman Hsu:

"I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, 'What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?' I was furious and getting more so by the second."

Actually, I think the anger act would be her last resort.

For now, her campaign is acting clueless, standing by Hsu's integrity.

From the Los Angeles Times:


For the last 15 years, California authorities have been trying to figure out what happened to a businessman named Norman Hsu, who pleaded no contest to grand theft, agreed to serve up to three years in prison and then seemed to vanish.

"He is a fugitive," Ronald Smetana, who handled the case for the state attorney general, said in an interview. "Do you know where he is?"

Hsu, it seems, has been hiding in plain sight, at least for the last three years.

Since 2004, one Norman Hsu has been carving out a prominent place of honor among Democratic fundraisers. He has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions into party coffers, much of it earmarked for presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

In addition to making his own contributions, Hsu has honed the practice of assembling packets of checks from contributors who bear little resemblance to the usual Democratic deep pockets: A self-described apparel executive with a variety of business interests, Hsu has focused on delivering hefty contributions from citizens who live modest lives and are neophytes in the world of campaign giving.

On Tuesday, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr. -- a Washington lawyer who represents the Democratic fundraiser -- confirmed that Hsu was the same man who was involved in the California case. Barcella said his client did not remember pleading to a criminal charge and facing the prospect of jail time. Hsu remembers the episode as part of a settlement with creditors when he also went through bankruptcy, Barcella said.

...As a Democratic rainmaker, Hsu -- who graduated from UC Berkeley and the Wharton School of Business -- is credited with donating nearly $500,000 to national and local party candidates and their political committees in the last three years. He earned a place in the Clinton campaign's "HillRaiser" group by pledging to raise more than $100,000 for her presidential bid.

Records show that Hsu helped raise an additional $500,000 from other sources for Clinton and other Democrats.

"Norman Hsu is a longtime and generous supporter of the Democratic Party and its candidates, including Sen. Clinton," Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for the campaign, said Tuesday.

"During Mr. Hsu's many years of active participation in the political process, there has been no question about his integrity or his commitment to playing by the rules, and we have absolutely no reason to call his contributions into question or to return them."

It's clear that Hillary is going to play the "I'm clueless" card -- AGAIN.

Her supporters don't seem to care when Hillary claims to be a victim.

Does the name David Rosen ring a bell?

If Hillary and her people are so stupid when it comes to fundraising, can she really be trusted to run the country?

If she's so willing to tolerate corruption in her campaign, what does that say about the sort of leadership we can expect from Hillary?


I guess it's says that she's a lot like Bill.

To quote Michelle Obama:

"If you can't run your own house, you can't run the White House."

My question for Hillary's supporters:

Is it worse for presidential candidate Hillary to be a liar, or to be so stupid that she doesn't realize people are lying?

________________________

UPDATE: Change of plans at Hillary headquarters--

WASHINGTON -- Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton will give to charity the $23,000 in donations she has received from a fundraiser who is wanted in California for failing to appear for sentencing on a 1991 grand theft charge.

The decision came Wednesday as other Democrats began distancing themselves from Norman Hsu, whose legal encounters and links to other Democratic donors have drawn public scrutiny in the past two days.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., also planned to turn over Hsu contributions to his 2004 presidential campaign to charity. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Al Franken, a Senate candidate in Minnesota, Reps. Michael Honda and Doris Matsui of California and Rep. Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania said they would divest their campaigns of Hsu's donations as well.

Hsu is a fundraiser for Clinton and is described as a devoted fan of the presidential candidate and New York senator. He had planned to co-host a money event for Clinton on Sept. 30. In a statement Wednesday, Hsu said he believed he had resolved his legal issues, but said he would halt his work raising political money.

"I would not consciously subject any of the candidates and causes in which I believe to any harm through my actions," he said. "Therefore, until this matter is resolved, I intend to refrain from all fundraising activities on behalf of all candidates and causes."

Clinton campaign spokesman Phil Singer said the $23,000 included contributions from Hsu to Clinton's presidential campaign, her Senate re-election and her political action committee. The campaign did not plan to return any money Hsu raised from other donors, Singer said.

"In light of the information regarding Mr. Hsu's outstanding warrant in California, we will be giving his contribution to charity," Singer said.

Yesterday, campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson said there was no plan to return any money.

Today, Hillary camp's is giving up some money. The decision to hand over $23,000 of the donations from Hsu to charity is a poor attempt to distance Hillary from the impropriety.

That sum is just a drop in her bucket.

Given how many candidates are connected to Hsu's dirty money, I think this story should be far more significant in terms of the 2008 political landscape than Larry Craig's airport bathroom behavior.

It should be but it won't be. The media are having way too much fun playing up Craig's case.

________________________

More on the mysterious Mr. Hsu:
Money has brought both trappings and trouble for Norman Hsu. Major contributions to the campaigns of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and other candidates have made the apparel executive an insider in elite political circles. He shows up in cozy pictures with politicians, at lavish fundraising events, and on the boards of prestigious organizations.

But Hsu's history includes more unsavory episodes and associations. In 1990, he allegedly was kidnapped by Chinese gang members in San Francisco as part of an apparent effort to collect a debt. A year and a half later, he pleaded no contest to a charge of fleecing investors in what authorities called a Ponzi scheme of fraud. Along the way, he left a bankruptcy filing and bitter investors who accused him of making off with their savings.

...Court documents and interviews with close associates of Hsu have shed considerable light on his unlikely emergence as a major Democratic fundraiser. But much of Hsu's story remains a mystery -- including how to account for significant gaps on his resume and record, and where he got all the money that he has showered on Democratic candidates and causes.

Clinton and other candidates have scrambled to distance themselves from Hsu's money. At a New York event Thursday, Clinton said: "I wish Mr. Hsu well in dealing with the problems he's confronting."

But he has powerful defenders. Former Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.) said in an interview that Hsu was being pilloried unfairly.

"This isn't Osama bin Laden or some drug kingpin," Kerrey said. "What he's done is he's volunteered to help people raise money for their campaigns. That doesn't make him either unique or bad."

...Records indicate that he didn't make his first federal campaign contribution until 2003, when he gave $2,000 to the presidential campaign of Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.). Hsu rapidly established himself as a major donor, contributing to an array of Democrats -- including California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, Louisiana Sen. Mary L. Landrieu and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

All have said in recent days that they plan to divest their campaigns of Hsu's donations.

Hsu has donated or raised more than $1 million for Democrats and their causes, often delivering large donations from multiple individuals. Some of these "bundled" contributions have raised suspicions. In particular, Hsu has worked closely with a family in Daly City, Calif., headed by William Paw, a mail carrier, and his wife, Alice, who is listed as a homemaker.

The Paws apparently never donated to national candidates until 2004. Since then, they have given $213,000, including $55,000 to Clinton. Barcella denies Hsu provided money for the contributions, which would violate federal law. The Paws, Barcella said, "have the financial wherewithal to make their own donations."

Who is Hsu?

Very strange. Very mysterious. Probably very corrupt.

______________________

Read more.

Another Milwaukee Teen Shot Dead

Hear that?

It's Milwaukee's wake up call for today.


From WISN.com:
A Milwaukee teenager is dead and another injured after a double shooting on Milwaukee's northside Tuesday night.

Police said a 17-year-old was shot and killed on the street near 24th Street and Auer Avenue. An 18-year-old was also shot in the back. He was taken into surgery at Froedert Hospital and is expected to live.

Police say the victims were shot around 7 p.m. After talking with witnesses and neighbors, police said they are looking for more than one shooter.

From 620 WTMJ:

Longtime residents like Michelle Watts say its another tragic murder on Milwaukee streets.

"These kids are getting younger and younger that are committing these homicides," she said. "They are getting a hold of these guns for some reason - drugs, alcohol, mental health. All of this is contributing to these things."

Police didn't immediately discuss a possible motive.

This has been a bloody week for Milwaukee, and it's only Wednesday morning.

Violence, thy name is Milwaukee!

Kohl Successfully Courts Yi


Rare photo of Kohl cracking a smile. (Photo/TMJ4)

Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl went on a mission to China.

He successfully brokered a deal.

This has nothing to do with his duties as a U.S. senator.

From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:



After Bucks owner Herb Kohl made a trip to Hong Kong to conduct personal negotiations with Yi's representatives, the young Chinese star signed a multiyear deal with the Bucks, ending a saga that began on draft night when he was selected with the sixth overall pick by Milwaukee.

The Bucks announced the signing at 2:15 a.m Milwaukee time (3:15 p.m. in Hong Kong).

Kohl, Bucks general manager Larry Harris and team vice president Ron Walter met with Yi, Chinese Basketball Association officials and Guangdong Tigers owner Chen Haitao on Wednesday in Hong Kong.

"We all anticipate Yi's arrival and welcome him and his family to Milwaukee," Kohl said. "We look forward to a successful relationship for many years to come."

Yi and his representatives initially had balked at signing with the Bucks and requested a trade to another NBA team, preferably one in a major market or with a large Asian American population. Prior to the draft, agent Dan Fegan had warned the Bucks not to select Yi and had not allowed Bucks officials to conduct a private workout of the Chinese player at his Los Angeles training base.

But the Bucks insisted throughout the summer that they did not intend to trade Yi, and their hand was strengthened when they were able to sign their own free agent point guard, Mo Williams, to a six-year, $52 million contract. That lessened the chances they would be inclined to deal Yi, who had gained fame in China for his play with the Guangdong team. He appeared in the last five CBA finals with the Tigers and led them to titles in 2004, 2005 and 2006.

...Earlier this summer, Sen. Kohl wrote a letter inviting Yi, his family and his representatives to visit Milwaukee.

And from Reuters:

Bucks owner Herb Kohl, present at the signing, said he was eager to see Yi in action.

"A-Lian is an extraordinarily fine person and he's a great basketball player and we couldn't be more pleased with having him," said Kohl, using Yi's Chinese nickname.

From TMJ4:
“There has been a genuine excitement throughout our city and state, as well as internationally, following our selection of Yi in the NBA Draft,” Kohl said in a statement.

So Kohl managed to seal the deal with Yi. Quite an accomplishment. Can you feel the excitement?

I can't remember when I've ever seen Kohl this happy. Then again, I don't see him all that much, other than in his campaign commercials.

Too bad Kohl doesn't put as much energy and enthusiasm into his stint as a U.S. senator as he devotes to the Bucks.

For example, Kohl finally got around to updating his website and issuing a formal statement on the resignation of AG Alberto Gonzales.

I am pleased that there will be an opportunity for new leadership at the Justice Department. Attorney General Gonzales has lost the confidence of people all across America and needs to be replaced. It is essential that his successor have more independence from the White House and always put the rule of law before politics.

Speaking of getting one's priorities straight, I get the feeling that Kohl puts the Bucks before his duties to his constituents.

He drags himself to China, yet Kohl has never visited Iraq since the war began, one of eighteen U.S. senators never to do so (as of August 1, 2007).

If Sean Penn and Angelina Jolie can travel to Iraq, I would think that the honorable Sen. Kohl could manage to fit a quick trip there into his schedule.

Leona Helmsley and Trouble

This is one lucky dog.
NEW YORK -- Leona Helmsley's dog will continue to live an opulent life, and then be buried alongside her in a mausoleum. But two of Helmsley's grandchildren got nothing from the late luxury hotelier and real estate billionaire's estate.

Helmsley left her beloved white Maltese, named Trouble, a $12 million trust fund, according to her will, which was made public Tuesday in surrogate court.

She also left millions for her brother, Alvin Rosenthal, who was named to care for Trouble in her absence, as well as two of four grandchildren from her late son Jay Panzirer — so long as they visit their father's grave site once each calendar year.

Otherwise, she wrote, neither will get a penny of the $5 million she left for each.

Helmsley left nothing to two of Jay Panzirer's other children — Craig and Meegan Panzirer — for "reasons that are known to them," she wrote.

But no one made out better than Trouble, who once appeared in ads for the Helmsley Hotels, and lived up to her name by biting a housekeeper.

"I direct that when my dog, Trouble, dies, her remains shall be buried next to my remains in the Helmsley mausoleum," Helmsley wrote in her will.

A $12 million trust fund for her dog and not a dime for two of her grandchildren -- Helmsley obviously had a better relationship with Trouble than some people in her life.

Maybe those two grandchildren who were stiffed weren't in her life at all.


As for the two grandchildren awarded $5 million each, they can't get their money unless they carry out Helmsley's orders. Although it's not too much to ask that they visit their father's grave once a year, it's an indication of her wanting to maintain some control over their behavior, putting a price on respect and love.

Helmsley definitely was a power freak, but she's also a dog lover. Trouble probably was her faithful companion and Helmsley adored her.

What do Helmsley's final wishes reveal about her?

Mean, old bag or big softy?

I think at least two of her grandchildren probably fall in the mean, old bag camp.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Edwards Asks Americans to Sacrifice

John Edwards thinks Americans need to conserve energy.

He wants them to give up their SUVs.

Edwards complains that Americans are the worst polluters on the planet and the country must change.


LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. -- Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards told a labor group that he would ask Americans to make a big sacrifice: their sport utility vehicles.

"I think Americans are actually willing to sacrifice," Edwards said Tuesday during a forum held by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. "One of the things they should be asked to do is drive more fuel efficient vehicles."

The former North Carolina senator was asked specifically if he would tell them to give up their SUVs, he said, "Yes."

...He also said as president he would ask residents to conserve energy and said the U.S. needs to focus on being a leader in creating alternative energy. He said he wants a national cap on carbon dioxide emissions that is lowered each year.

"We are the worst polluter on the planet. We are 4 percent of the world's population, we're putting out 25 percent of the world's greenhouse gas," Edwards said. "America's going to have to change."

Apparently, Edwards considers himself exempt. He's not one of the Americans that he believes must make sacrifices for the good of the planet.

One need only take a quick look at his 28,200-square-foot home on his 102-acre
estate in Orange County, North Carolina to get an idea of what a hypocrite he is.

[T]he Edwards home total[s] 28,200 square feet of connected space. The main house is 10,400 square feet and has two garages. The recreation building, a red, barn-like building containing 15,600 square feet, is connected to the house by a closed-in and roofed structure of varying widths and elevations that totals 2,200 square feet.

The main house is all on one level except for a 600-square-foot bedroom and bath area above the guest garage.

The recreation building contains a basketball court, a squash court, two stages, a bedroom, kitchen, bathrooms, swimming pool, a four-story tower, and a room designated “John’s Lounge.”

"Guest garage"?

"Recreation building"?

"A 600-square-foot bedroom and bath area above the guest garage"?

That's extravagant.

It's excessive.


Edwards was asked during his appearance how he explained the contradiction of asking Americans to sacrifice while he's living in a 28,000-square-foot (2,600-square-meter) mansion.

He said he came from nothing, worked hard all his life, has always supported workers and fought big corporations as a lawyer.

"I have no apologies whatsoever for what I've done with my life," he said to loud cheers. "My entire life has been about the same cause, which is making sure wherever you come from, whatever your family is, whatever the color of your skin, you get a real chance to do something great in this country."

Huh?

What gives Edwards the right to live in an enormous mansion and consume massive amounts of energy?

He claims he makes "no apologies whatsoever" for what he believes he's earned.

What about SUV owners?

Why is Edwards asking them to give up what they've worked hard to attain?

Shouldn't those people have the right to say that they make no apologies for driving SUVs because they've worked hard all their lives?

If Edwards wants Americans to sacrifice, he needs to set an example by making some sacrifices of his own.

Maybe he could scale his recreation building back just a bit to save a little energy. Maybe some homeless people could live at his place.

Bottom line: Edwards' call for Americans to give up their SUVs is a joke.




Getting Robin Shellow's Goat

Receiving a pink gift bag holding a severed goat's head with a threatening note stuffed in its mouth is not a good way to start the week.

From Today's TMJ4:

Someone left a pink gift bag outside Robin Shellow's office, located at 324 West Vine Street, with a severed goat's head inside. To make matters worse police say there was a threatening note written to Shellow in the goat's mouth.

...The bag was found about 11 a.m Monday on the ground outside the lawyer's office, police Capt. Debra Davidoski said Tuesday.

"It was gross," Davidoski said.

A goat's head is a satanic symbol.

Shellow wouldn't talk to TODAYS TMJ 4 on camera, but she released a statement.

"August 27, 2007 was a full moon and was also the eve of a complete lunar eclipse," she wrote, before listing several local crimes and scandals in which she represented the defendants.

She went on to say: "It has been a few to several months since I have invented any new psychologically based defenses, the only thing I can assume is that someone was trying to get my attention on a lovely summer day and was unable to locate his or her copy of the yellow pages."

...Police checked with local meat processors to see if they could track down the goat slayer, but haven't had any luck, Davidoski said.

Police were treating the case as a threat. They also were investigating whether any of Shellow's past clients had anything to do with it.

There are some real sickos out there.

Putting the motive, the satanic connection, and the message to Shellow aside, I think reaction to the goat's head is interesting.

The focus is on the threat and the gruesome contents in the gift bag, reminiscent of the horse head scene from The Godfather.

What creep did this and why? What does it mean?

There doesn't seem to be a lot of concern for the goat. This isn't being examined from the animal cruelty angle.

I think reaction would be very different if Shellow had received a severed dog's head.


Goats get no respect.

Larry Craig: "I AM NOT GAY"

Larry Craig chose not to take the path chosen by former governor of New Jersey Jim "I am a gay American" McGreevey.

Senator Craig made the following statement to Idaho at 2:30pm:

"First, please let me apologize to my family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho. I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I regret my decision to plead guilty and the sadness that decision has brought to my wife, family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans. For that I apologize.

"In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision. While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else, I chose to plead guilty to a lesser charge in the hope of making it go away. I did not seek any counsel, either from an attorney, staff, friends, or family. That was a mistake, and I deeply regret it. Because of that, I have now retained counsel and I am asking my counsel to review this matter and to advise me on how to proceed.

"For a moment, I want to put my state of mind into context on June 11. For 8 months leading up to June, my family and I had been relentlessly and viciously harassed by the Idaho Statesman. If you’ve seen today’s paper, you know why. Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been.

"Still, without a shred of truth or evidence to the contrary, the Statesman has engaged in this witch hunt. In pleading guilty, I overreacted in Minneapolis, because of the stress of the Idaho Statesman’s investigation and the rumors it has fueled around Idaho. Again, that overreaction was a mistake, and I apologize for my misjudgment. Furthermore, I should not have kept this arrest to myself, and should have told my family and friends about it. I wasn’t eager to share this failure, but I should have done so anyway.

"I love my wife, family, friends, staff, and Idaho. I love serving Idaho in Congress. Over the years, I have accomplished a lot for Idaho, and I hope Idahoans will allow me to continue to do that. There are still goals I would like to accomplish, and I believe I can still be an effective leader for Idaho. Next month, I will announce, as planned, whether or not I will seek reelection.

"As an elected official, I fully realize that my life is open for public criticism and scrutiny, and I take full responsibility for the mistake in judgment I made in attempting to handle this matter myself.

"It is clear, though, that through my actions I have brought a cloud over Idaho. For that, I ask the people of Idaho for their forgiveness.

"As I mentioned earlier, I have now retained counsel to examine this matter and I will make no further comment."

I don't understand.

Craig isn't gay, but he wanted to have anonymous gay sex in an airport bathroom?

Was his flight delayed and he got bored?


Listening to Craig speak was like hearing Bill Clinton say:
"I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time – never. These allegations are false."

If this was all truly a misunderstanding, I don't see why Craig would keep the arrest from his wife.

I don't understand why he didn't seek counsel immediately.



"If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck."

Chef Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can cook.

He's doing more today than bragging about his prowess in the kitchen.

He's also talking about a vacuum.

First, Ahmadinejad's
cooking skills:
Better known for his defiance on Iran's nuclear programme, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday revealed he was a handy cook who prepares "delicious" food and regrets not spending more time at home.

In a television interview aimed at showing his personal side, Ahmadinejad made no mention of Iran's disputes with the West and instead portrayed himself as a hardworking husband who only leaves his job in the small hours.

"Before (I became president) I used to do the grocery shopping. Now sometimes I help in the kitchen and I know how to make all the Iranian food," Ahmadinejad said.

Pressed by the interviewer for more details, Ahmadinejad continued in typically defiant fashion.

"Of course what I make is delicious -- ask everyone who has eaten it! I can make all the different kinds of soups and Iranian stews," said the president.

What a guy!

He can cook, shop for groceries. I wonder if he likes to do laundry, too.

We know Ahmadinejad is interested in a vacuum.

TEHRAN (Reuters) -- Iran is ready to fill a vacuum in Iraq caused by the collapsing power of the United States, its president said on Tuesday.

"The political power of the occupiers (of Iraq) is being destroyed rapidly and very soon we will be witnessing a great power vacuum in the region," Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said.

"We, with the help of regional friends and the Iraqi nation, are ready to fill this void." Saudi Arabia was one of the countries Iran was ready to work with, he said.

The U.S. military accuses the Islamic Republic of arming and training militias behind some of the violence in Iraq. Iran rejects the charge and blames the presence of U.S. forces, numbering about 162,000, for the violence.

In a two-hour news conference, Ahmadinejad also rejected reports Iran had slowed nuclear work, which the West fears is aimed at making atom bombs, and said it would respond if Washington branded its Revolutionary Guards a terrorist force.

Oh, no!

Ahmadinejad isn't referring to vacuuming floors. He's threatening to fill the vacuum in Iraq when the "occupiers" leave.

What now, Russ Feingold?

What does John Warner have to say about Iran being poised to fill the vacuum?

Do all the Democrat presidential candidates still believe that hastily pulling out of Iraq is in the long term best interests of the United States?

If only Ahmadinejad had put his energies into being the best chef he could be rather than trying to start a world war.

Make Iranian stew, not nuclear warheads.

__________________________

In an address to the 89th Annual National Convention of the American Legion, President Bush made clear that Ahmadinejad would be wise to spend more time in his kitchen.

Transcript

Poverty in America

There's some good news.

U.S. poverty rate declines significantly

The nation's poverty rate dropped last year, the first significant decline since President Bush took office.

The Census Bureau reported Tuesday that 36.5 million Americans, or 12.3 percent — were living in poverty last year. That's down from 12.6 percent in 2005.

The median household income was $48,200, a slight increase from the previous year. But the number of people without health insurance also increased, to 47 million.

The last significant decline in the poverty rate came in 2000, during the Clinton administration. In 2005, the poverty rate dipped from 12.7 percent to 12.6 percent, but Census officials said that change was statistically insignificant.

The poverty numbers are good economic news at a time when financial markets have been rattled by a slumping housing market. However, the numbers released Tuesday represent economic conditions from a year ago.

The poverty level is the official measure used to decide eligibility for federal health, housing, nutrition and child care benefits. It differs by family size and makeup. For a family of four with two children, for example, the poverty level is $20,444. The poverty rate — the percentage of people living below poverty — helps shape the debate on the health of the nation's economy.

For Milwaukee, there's some bad news.

Milwaukee has 8th-highest poverty rate

Milwaukee has the eighth-highest rate of poverty among large cities in America, according to estimates released today by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Around one in four Milwaukee residents (26.2%) live in poverty. Higher rates were recorded in Detroit, Buffalo, N.Y., Cincinnati, Cleveland, Miami, St. Louis and El Paso, Texas.

On a positive note, Wisconsin's poverty rate is below the national average. That's in spite of Milwaukee's high placement on the most impoverished cities list.
Overall, Wisconsin's poverty rate is 11%, with 591,850 people in poverty.

Lots of numbers.

What does it really mean to live in poverty in America?

I'm not saying it's pleasant, but it's certainly not as bad as living in poverty elsewhere in the world.

Robert Rector gives some details on what it's like to be poor in America.

In the past, [John] Edwards has claimed that poverty in America is a “plague” which forces 37 million Americans to live in “terrible” circumstances. According to Edwards, an amazing “one in eight” Americans lack “enough money for the food, shelter, and clothing they need,” caught in a daily “struggle with incredible poverty.”

However, examination of the living standards of the 37 million or so persons, the government defines as “poor,” reveals that America’s poverty “plague” may not be as “terrible” or “incredible” as anti-poverty crusader Edwards contends.

If being “poor” means (as Edwards claims it does) a lack of nutritious food, adequate warm housing, and clothing for a family, then very few of America’s 37 million official “poor” people can be regarded as actually poor. Some material hardship does exist in the United States, but, in reality, it is quite restricted in scope and severity.

The following are facts about persons defined as “poor” by the Census Bureau, taken from a variety of government reports:
---46 percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.

---80 percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

---Only six percent of poor households are overcrowded; two thirds have more than two rooms per person.

---The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)

---Nearly three quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.

---97 percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.

---78 percent have a VCR or DVD player.

---62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.

---89 percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.

As a group, America’s poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms. Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100-percent above recommended levels. Most poor children today are, in fact, super-nourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and ten pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.

Rector also notes that poverty in America can be traced to a few specific factors, such as the absence of fathers in homes.
Nearly two thirds of poor children reside in single-parent homes; each year, an additional 1.5 million children are born out of wedlock. If poor mothers married the fathers of their children, nearly three quarters of the nation’s impoverished youth would immediately be lifted out of poverty.

Yet, although work and marriage are reliable ladders out of poverty, the welfare system perversely remains hostile to both. Major programs such as food stamps, public housing, and Medicaid continue to reward idleness and penalize marriage. If welfare could be turned around to encourage work and marriage, the nation’s remaining poverty could be reduced.

Another factor in poverty is ILLEGAL immigration.
Another important factor boosting poverty in the U.S. is our broken immigration system which imports hundreds of thousands of additional poor people each year from abroad through both legal and illegal immigration channels. One quarter of all poor persons in the U.S. are now first generation immigrants or the minor children of those immigrants. Roughly one in ten of the persons counted among the poor by Census is either an illegal immigrant or the minor child of an illegal. Immigrants tend to be poor because they have very low education levels. A quarter of legal immigrants and fifty to sixty percent of illegals are high-school dropouts. By contrast, only nine percent of non-immigrant Americans lack a high school degree.

As long as the present steady flow of poverty-prone persons from foreign countries continues, efforts to reduce the total number of poor in the U.S. will be far more difficult. A sound anti-poverty strategy must not only seek to increase work and marriage among native born Americans, it must also end illegal immigration, and dramatically increase the skill level of future legal immigrants.

I'm not dismissing the issue of poverty in the U.S., nor am I suggesting that people have no moral obligation to help the disadvantaged.

However, I do think it's important to understand what the poverty figures mean.

I also think it's extremely important not to be bamboozled by John Edwards' rhetoric (lies).

I strongly believe that government handouts aren't the answer to poverty. In fact, we have decades of proof that entitlements create a culture of poverty.

Welfare is not a family business to be handed down to the next generation.

Sen. Larry Craig and Double Standards

Idaho's Sen. Larry Craig is a Republican. That's the problem.

He pleaded guilty on misdemeanor charges of disorderly conduct in a men's restroom at the airport in Minneapolis.

Read more.

Whenever a Republican is involved in something like this, the Left gets giddy.

It's as if ALL Republicans, especially conservative Republicans, are expected to be saints. If a Republican official falls short, Leftists are the first to cast stones.

I'm in no way condoning Craig's behavior.

But let's be fair.

There are perverts to the Left and perverts to the Right.

Rather than condemning Craig, shouldn't the Left invite Craig to join its ranks, ask him to get under its Big Tent where such indiscretions are celebrated or at least readily forgiven?

Complicating matters in Craig's case was his association with Mitt Romney's campaign.



Already Craig has stepped down from a prominent role with Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. He had been one of Romney's top Senate supporters, serving as a Senate liaison for the campaign since February.

"He did not want to be a distraction and we accept his decision," said Matt Rhoades, a Romney campaign spokesman.

This bugs me:


A political science professor in Idaho said Craig's political future was in jeopardy. And a spokesman for the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, Hannah August, said Craig's guilty plea "has given Americans another reason not to vote Republican" next year.

The married Craig, 62, has faced rumors about his sexuality since the 1980s, but allegations that he has engaged in gay sex have never been substantiated. Craig has denied the assertions, which he calls ridiculous.

The arrest changes that dynamic, said Jasper LiCalzi, a political science professor at Albertson College of Idaho in Caldwell, Idaho. He cited the House page scandal that drove Florida Rep. Mark Foley from office.

"There's a chance that he'll resign over this," LiCalzi said. "With the pressure on the Republican Party, he could be pressured to resign. If they think this is going to be something that's the same as Mark Foley — the sort of 'drip, drip, drip, there's more information that's going to come out' — they may try to push him out."

A scandal that involves a Republican is framed as a career breaker.

When Democrats behave in a lewd and lascivious manner, the libs circle the wagons and cite their rights to privacy.

Case in point: Former President Bill Clinton.

He finally admits to "being serviced" by Monica Lewinsky, after months of denials. Without the DNA evidence, Clinton would have continued to lie. Maybe the brilliant Hillary would still be claiming to be in the dark on that one.

Does the name Juanita Broaddrick ring a bell?

There have been so many other Dems embroiled in scandal. So many are met with endless excuses and abundant compassion.

Barney Frank's romp with male hooker Steve Gobie and the prostitution ring that he ran out of Frank's apartment was forgiven.

Speaking of prostitution, I'd still like to know more about Bill Broydrick and his D.C. Madame connection. More info please.

Then there's Gerry Studds. He was hailed as courageous for having a homosexual relationship with a 17-year-old page! He became a role model!

The double standard is frustrating.


It's also disturbing that elected officials behave so recklessly.

Craig seems to be driven to serve himself rather than his constituents.

____________________________

Read Charles Krauthammer's "Sex Scandals and Double Standards."

OBESITY: WHERE THE FAT IS

Wisconsin is NOT at the top of the list of the states with the fattest populations.

Obesity rates in adults starting with highest rate
Ranking by state

Note: 1 = Highest rate of adult obesity, 51 = lowest.

Rankings are based on combining three years of data (2004-2006) from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Behavioral Risk Surveillance System to “stabilize” data for comparison purposes. States with statistically significant (p<0.05)>



1: Mississippi**
2: West Virginia*
3: Alabama
4: Louisiana
5 (tie): South Carolina** Tennessee*
7: Kentucky**
8: Arkansas
9 (tie): Indiana, Michigan* Oklahoma**
12 (tie): Missouri**, Texas
14: Georgia; 15: Ohio**
16: Alaska
17: North Carolina**
18: Nebraska**;
19: North Dakota
20 (tie): Iowa, South Dakota**
22: Wisconsin**
23 (tie): Pennsylvania, Virginia*
25 (tie): Illinois, Maryland**
27: Kansas*
28: Minnesota
29: Delaware**
30: Oregon**
31 (tie): Idaho, Washington**
33: Maine*
34: Florida**
35: Wyoming**
36: California
37: Nevada*
38 (tie): New Hampshire**, New York
40 (tie): D.C., New Jersey**;
42: New Mexico**
43: Arizona
44: Utah
45: Montana
46: Rhode Island**
47 (tie): Connecticut**, Hawaii*
49: Vermont
50: Massachusetts**
51: Colorado*


Obesity rates in children starting with highest rate
State-by-state Overweight Children Ages 10-17 Rankings

Note: 1 = Highest rate of childhood overweight, 51 = lowest. Rankings are based on the National Survey of Children’s Health, a phone survey of parents with children ages 10-17 conducted in 2003-04 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Additional information about methodologies and confidence intervals are available in the report. Children with a body mass index (BMI) (a calculation based on weight and height ratios) at or above the 95th percentile for their age are considered overweight.


1: D.C.
2: West Virginia
3: Kentucky
4: Tennessee
5: North Carolina
6: Texas
7: South Carolina
8: Mississippi
9: Louisiana
10: New Mexico
11: Alabama
12 (tie): Arkansas, Georgia
14: Illinois
15 (tie) Indiana, Missouri
17: Oklahoma
18: New York
19: Delaware
20: Michigan
21: Florida
22: Ohio
23: Oregon
24: Kansas
25: Virginia
26: New Jersey
27:Massachusetts
28: Wisconsin
29 (tie) Hawaii, Maryland, Pennsylvania
32: California
33: New Hampshire
34: Maine
35: Iowa
36: Nevada
37: Connecticut
38: Arizona
39 (tie): North Dakota, South Dakota
41 (tie): Nebraska, Rhode Island
43: Vermont
44 (tie) Alaska, Montana;
46: Washington
47 (tie): Idaho, Minnesota
49: Colorado
50: Wyoming
51: Utah

The bad news: Wisconsin adults are getting fatter. The state led the country in the greatest increase of number of obese adults.

The good news: Twenty-one states have fatter populations than Wisconsin.

From the Wisconsin State Journal:

Wisconsin was about average. The state had the 22nd highest rate of adult obesity, at 24.5 percent. It had 28th highest rate of childhood obesity, at 13.5 percent.

More people exercise in Wisconsin than the national average, the report said.

Take note late night comedians.

Update your punchlines.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Police Chief Lou Diamond Philips

Mayor Tom Barrett is making progress on the search for a replacement for Nan Hegerty.

It's Lou Diamond Philips.

MILWAUKEE -- NBC is shooting a pilot for a new drama called “The Watch” in Milwaukee. Actor Lou Diamond Philips was here shooting a scene near the Calatrava Monday.

He plays Milwaukee’s Police Chief, something Mayor Tom Barrett had fun with.

"Today I'm pleased to announce our new police chief, Lou Diamond Philips," Mayor Barrett joked.

“The streets will be safe,” Philips assured the mayor in return.

The producers decided to use Milwaukee as the setting for their show because of new incentives for TV and movies to shoot here.

“We’re going to be seeing a lot of your downtown beauty, and be a part of that,” Philips said.

The director of the show, Charles McDougall won an Emmy for directing the pilot to “Desperate Housewives.” There's no decision on whether NBC will pick up the show.

"The Watch," is a show about a neighborhood watch group that takes matters into its own hands in the fictional Milwaukee suburb of Ridgeview.

It would be great for Milwaukee to serve as the setting for a new TV drama, something to dull the memory of Happy Days and Laverne and Shirley.

I don't really understand the premise of the show, The Watch.

Does this neighborhood watch group venture into the city to take "matters into its own hands" and become crime fighters within the city limits?

Does the group battle Milwaukee bad guys descending on their suburb of Ridgeview?

What does a neighborhood watch group in a suburb have to do with Milwaukee and its police chief?

Who knows?

I think it's kind of funny that Barrett showed up to greet Philips and the crew, the fictional crime fighters.

"We don't solve crime in Milwaukee. We just pretend to on TV."

Actually, it was appropriate for Barrett to be on hand, given the push to entice TV and movie productions to come the city.

I think Philips was very gracious to comment on the beauty of downtown Milwaukee. That was very nice.

Producers have plenty of lovely backdrops for the action, like the Calatrava and Lake Michigan.

Milwaukee also has plenty of rotting neighborhoods that would make good crime scene sites for the drama. Fiction would meet reality.

The challenge would be to dodge the real bullets from real shootings as the shooting of the drama proceeds.

Paul D. Clement

Paul D. Clement, the interim replacement for the departing Alberto Gonzales, has put Cedarburg on the map.

Well, not really.

Outside of Cedarburg, no one cares where Clement grew up.


Clement's DOJ bio
Paul D. Clement is the 43rd Solicitor General of the United States. He was nominated by President George W. Bush on March 14, 2005, confirmed by the United States Senate on June 8, 2005, and took the oath of office on June 13, 2005.

Mr. Clement is a native of Cedarburg, Wisconsin, and a graduate of the Cedarburg public schools. He received his bachelor’s degree summa cum laude from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, and a master’s degree in economics from Cambridge University. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School where he was the Supreme Court editor of the Harvard Law Review.

Following graduation, Mr. Clement clerked for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court. After his clerkships, he worked as an associate in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mr. Clement went on to serve as Chief Counsel of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Federalism and Property Rights. Afterwards, he was a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of King & Spalding, where he headed the firm’s appellate practice. Mr. Clement also served from 1998 to 2004 as an Adjunct Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where he taught a seminar on the separation of powers.

Mr. Clement joined the Department of Justice in February of 2001. Before his confirmation as Solicitor General, he served as Acting Solicitor General for nearly a year and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General. He has argued over 40 cases before the United States Supreme Court, including McConnell v. FEC, Tennessee v. Lane, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, United States v. Booker and Gonzales v. Raich. He also argued many of the key cases in the lower courts involving challenges to the President’s conduct of the war on terrorism.

Impressive.

TIME claims to know why Alberto Gonzales finally caved.

Of course, it's Karl Rove. When Rove left, so did Gonzales' protector.

Yeah, whatever.

Are the Dems popping champagne corks over the departure of Gonzales?


Of course.

Score another victory for them in their war against the Bush administration.

Read
President Bush's complete statement.
After months of unfair treatment that has created a harmful distraction at the Justice Department, Judge Gonzales decided to resign his position, and I accept his decision. It's sad that we live in a time when a talented and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons.

I've asked Solicitor General Paul Clement to serve as Acting Attorney General upon Alberto Gonzales's departure and until a nominee has been confirmed by the Senate. He's agreed to do so. Paul is one of the finest lawyers in America. As Solicitor General, Paul has developed a reputation for excellence and fairness, and earned the respect and confidence of the entire Justice Department.

Read what the embarrassment from Wisconsin, Sen. Russ Feingold, has to say:
“Attorney General Gonzales’ tenure was marked by unprecedented politicization of the Department of Justice, deception of Congress and the American people, and disrespect for the rule of law. He should never have been confirmed and should have resigned long ago. The first loyalty of the next attorney general must be to the law, not the president.”

What?

No mention of Gonzales being the first Hispanic attorney general the U.S. has ever had?


What will Feingold do without Gonzales to kick around?

Read what Sen. Herb Kohl has to say:

Sorry. No statement is available on Kohl's website.

However, someone did wake up Kohl to tell him that Gonzales is resigning.

From the
Green Bay Press-Gazette:
"It is essential that his successor have more independence from the White House and always put the rule of law before politics," Kohl said.

Kohl said Gonzales had lost the confidence of Congress and the public because of the apparent politicization of hiring and firing U.S. attorneys and the his role in a controversial wiretapping program critics argue violates civil liberties in the United States.

And on Paul Clement:
Paul Clement, who will serve as interim attorney general, is a meticulous, affable conservative with friends across the political spectrum.

As solicitor general, Clement holds the fourth-ranking position at the Justice Department. He was asked by Bush to head the agency until a new attorney general is nominated, then confirmed by the Senate.

With the resignation of Gonzales, as well as earlier departures of the next two officials in line, Clement is the Justice Department’s highest-ranking official who has been confirmed by the Senate.

In his current post, Clement is the administration’s top lawyer at the Supreme Court. He regularly argues the most important cases that come before the court, defending Bush’s anti-terrorism program as well as federal laws imposing limits on abortion and campaign fundraising.

Clement, 41, has worked for former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Justice Antonin Scalia, stalwarts of the right in American politics and law. He once belonged to the conservative Federalist Society and continues to speak often at its events.

Yet Feingold has been among Clement’s biggest boosters, principally because of Clement’s Supreme Court defense of the landmark campaign finance law that Feingold co-authored. Clement is a native of Cedarburg.

Clement defended McCain-Feingold.

Wonderful.